100% Pass Quiz 2025 ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor: Trustable Verified ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam Answers

Blog Article

Tags: Verified ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Answers, ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor PDF Cram Exam, Free ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Brain Dumps, Test Certification ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Cost, New ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Test Cost

To let the clients have an understanding of their mastery degree of our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor study materials and get a well preparation for the test, we provide the test practice software to the clients. The test practice software of ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor study materials is based on the real test questions and its interface is easy to use. The test practice software boosts the test scheme which stimulate the real test and boost multiple practice models, the historical records of the practice of ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Study Materials and the self-evaluation function.

PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic	Details
Topic 1	Fundamental audit concepts and principles: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and outlines essential audit concepts such as evidence collection, impartiality, objectivity, and ethical conduct. It introduces the core principles that form the foundation of a reliable and consistent auditing process.
Topic 2	Preparing an ISO IEC 42001 audit: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and covers how to plan and prepare for an AI management system audit. It includes creating audit plans, selecting team members, and setting clear objectives to ensure a smooth audit process.
Topic 3	AI management system requirements: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and focuses on understanding the key requirements outlined in ISO IEC 42001. It explains how organizations should structure their AI-related activities and processes to meet compliance standards effectively.
Topic 4	Managing an ISO IEC 42001 audit program: This section of the exam measures the skills of an AI Compliance Officer and deals with overseeing an entire audit program. It involves managing multiple audits, tracking audit performance, and aligning audit outcomes with broader organizational goals related to AI governance.
Topic 5	Closing an ISO IEC 42001 audit: This section of the exam measures the skills of an AI Compliance Officer and explains how to complete the audit process. It includes reporting findings, managing nonconformities, and conducting follow-ups to ensure continuous improvement and compliance.
Topic 6	Conducting an ISO IEC 42001 audit: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and focuses on executing the audit according to ISO IEC 42001 guidelines. It includes collecting evidence, interviewing relevant staff, and evaluating compliance with the AI management system standards.

>> Verified ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Answers <<

2025 ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor: Authoritative Verified ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam Answers

Besides, considering the current status of practice materials market based on exam candidates’ demand, we only add concentrated points into our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam tool to save time and cost for you. Our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam tool has three versions for you to choose, PDF, App, and software. If you have any question or hesitate, you can download our free Demo. The Demo will show you part of the content of our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Study Materials real exam materials. So you do not have to worry about the quality of our exam questions. Our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam tool have been trusted and purchased by thousands of candidates. What are you waiting for?

PECB ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam Sample Questions (Q71-Q76):

NEW QUESTION # 71
Question:
Which of the following describes a joint audit?

A. When two or more auditing organizations cooperate to audit a single auditee
B. When two or more management systems are audited together at a single auditee
C. When audits are conducted back-to-back for efficiency
D. When an internal audit and a third-party audit are conducted simultaneously

Answer: A

Explanation:
AJoint Auditis when two or more audit organizationscooperateto audit the same auditee.
* ISO 19011:2018 Clause 3.9defines joint audit as:"An audit carried out by two or more auditing organizations cooperating to audit a single auditee."
* This is further echoed in ISO/IEC 42001:2023, which supports joint audits especially inmulti-country and consortium environments (Clause 9.2.1 reference to audit scope management).
Reference:ISO 19011:2018 Clause 3.9; ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 9.2.1.

NEW QUESTION # 72
Question:
During an audit, the auditor employed data analytic technology to identify anomalies and unusualpatterns in the decision-making processes of an AI system used by a financial institution to approve or reject loan applications. Which data analytic technology did the auditor use?

A. Visual analytics
B. Text analytics
C. Data mining
D. Predictive analytics

Answer: C

Explanation:
The auditor usedData Mining.
* Data mininginvolves exploring large datasets to identify patterns, anomalies, or relationships.
* ISO/IEC 20546:2019 Clause 3.5defines data mining as:"The process of discovering patterns, correlations, anomalies, and associations within large datasets."
* In ISO/IEC 42001:2023, auditors are encouraged in Clause 9.2.2 to useappropriate technological tools to analyze AI system behavior, including using big data technologies for pattern recognition during audits.
Reference:ISO/IEC 20546:2019 Clause 3.5; ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 9.2.2.

NEW QUESTION # 73
Question:
What is a significant drawback of using judgment-based sampling in audits?

A. It requires extensive statistical training for the audit team
B. It relies mostly on previously identified significant risks
C. It does not allow for a statistical estimate of uncertainty in the audit findings

Answer: C

Explanation:
The major limitation ofjudgment-based samplingis that itdoes not support statistical estimation of audit uncertainty.
* ISO 19011:2018 Clause 6.5.5clarifies:"Judgment-based sampling may introduce bias and cannot provide statistical confidence in the findings."
* Although this method is useful for targeting high-risk areas, it lacks quantifiable precision.
Reference:ISO 19011:2018 Clause 6.5.5; ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor Guide - Section 6 ("AuditSampling and Limitations").

NEW QUESTION # 74
Scenario 2 (continued):
Empsy HR Solutions is a human resources consulting company that provides innovative HR solutions to diverse industries.Recognizing the significant impact of artificial intelligence Al in HR processes, including its ability to automate repetitive tasks, analyzevast amounts of data for insights, improve recruitment and talent management strategies, and personalize employee experiences, thecompany has initiated the implementation of an artificial intelligence management system AIMS based on ISO/IEC 42001.
Initially, the top management established an Al policy that was aligned with the company's objectives. The Al policy provided a frameworkfor defining Al objectives, a commitment to meeting relevant requirements, and a dedication to continually improve the AIMS. However, it did not refer to other organizational policies, although some were relevant to the AIMS. Afterward, the top management documented thepolicy, communicated it internally, and made it accessible to interested parties.
The top management designated specific individuals to ensure that the AIMS meets the standard's requirements. Additionally, theyensured that these individuals were responsible for overseeing the AIMS, reporting its performance to the top management, andfacilitating continual improvement. Moreover, in its awareness sessions, the company focused exclusively on ensuring that all personnel were informed about the Al policy, emphasizing their role in ensuring the effectiveness of the AIMS and the benefits of enhanced Alperformance.
The company also planned, implemented, and monitored processes to meet AIMS requirements. Additionally, it set clear criteria andimplemented controls based on them, ensuring effective operation, alignment with organizational objectives, and continual improvement.Empsy HR Solutions decided to implement strict measures to control changes to documented information within the AIMS. To ensure theintegrity and accuracy of documentation, the company adopted version control practices. Each document update was tracked using aversioning system, with clear records of what was modified, who made the changes, and when the updates occurred. Access to makechanges was restricted to authorized personnel, and any proposed modifications required approval from the designated managementteam before being implemented.
Moreover, considering past experiences where the company encountered unforeseen risks, Empsy HR Solutions established acomprehensive Al risk assessment process. This process involved identifying, analyzing, and evaluating Al risks to determine if it isnecessary to implement additional controls than those specified in Annex A. The company also referred to Annex B for guidance onimplementing controls and, ultimately, produced a Statement of Applicability SoA. The SoA contained the necessary controls, including allthe controls of Annex A and justifications for their inclusion or exclusion.
Lastly. Empsy HR Solutions decided to establish an internal audit program to ensure the AIMS conforms to both the company'srequirements and ISO/IEC 42001. It defined the audit objectives, criteria, and scope for each audit, selected auditors, and ensuredobjectivity and impartiality during the audit process. The results of the first audit were documented and reported only to the top management of the company.
Question:
Based on Scenario 2, has Empsy HR Solutions established a suitable internal audit program?

A. No, results of audits should also be reported to the relevant managers
B. Yes, the internal audit program was established in accordance with ISO/IEC 42001 requirements
C. Yes, provided results are communicated only to top management
D. No, the company should outsource the internal audit function to ensure objectivity and impartiality

Answer: A

Explanation:
ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 9.2.2 specifies thatinternal audit results should be communicated to relevant managementin addition to top management. Only informing top management is insufficient and nonconforming.
Reference:ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 9.2.2 (Internal Audit Program Communication).

NEW QUESTION # 75
Scenario 5 (continued):
Scenario 5: Aizoia, located in Washington, DC, has revolutionized data analytics, software development, and consulting by usingadvanced Al algorithms. Central to its success is an Al platform adept at deciphering complex datasets for enhanced insights. To ensure that its Al systems operate effectively and responsibly, Aizoia has established an artificial intelligence management system AIMS basedon ISO/IEC 42001 and is now undergoing a certification audit to verify the AIMS's effectiveness and compliance with ISO/IEC 42001.
Robert, one of the certification body's full-time employees with extensive experience in auditing, was appointed as the audit team leaderdespite not receiving an official offer for the role. Understanding the critical importance of assembling an audit team with diverse skills and knowledge, the certification body selected competent individuals to form the audit team. The certification body appointed a team ofseven members to conduct the audit after considering the specific conditions of the audit mission and the required competencies.
Initially, the certification body, in cooperation with Aizoia, defined the extent and boundaries of the audit, specifying the sites (whetherphysical or virtual), organizational units, and the activities for review. Once the scope, processes, methods, and team composition hadbeen defined, the certification body provided the audit team leader with extensive information, including the audit objectives anddocumented details on the scope, processes, methods, and team compositions.
Additionally, the certification body shared contact details of the auditee, including locations, time frames, and the duration of the auditactivities to be conducted. The team leader also received information needed for evaluating and addressing identified risks andopportunities for the achievement of the audit objectives.
Before starting the audit, Robert wrote an engagement letter, introducing himself to Aizoia and outlining plans for scheduling initialcontact. The initial contact aimed to confirm thecommunication channels, establish the audit team's authority to conduct the audit, andsummarize the audit's key aspects, such as objectives, scope, criteria, methods, and team composition. Duringthis first meeting, Robertemphasized the need for access to essential information that would help to conduct the audit.
Moreover, audit logistics, such as scheduling, access, health and safety arrangements, observer attendance, and the need for guides orinterpreters, were thoroughly planned. The meeting also addressed areas of interest or concern, preemptively resolving potential issuesand finalizing any matters related to the audit team composition.
As the audit progressed, Robert recognized the complexity of Aizoia's operations, leading him to conclude that a review of its Al-relateddata governance practices was essential for compliance with ISO/IEC 42001. He discussed this need with Aizoia's management,proposing an expanded audit scope. After careful consideration, they agreed to conduct a thorough review of the Al data governancepractices, but there was no mutual decision to officially change the audit scope. Consequently. Robert decided to proceed with the auditbased on the original scope, adhering to the initial audit plan, and documented the conversation and decision accordingly.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Question:
Based on Scenario 5, did the certification body provide all the necessary information to conduct the audit to the audit team leader?

A. No, information on the resources necessary to conduct the audit was not provided
B. Yes, all the necessary information was provided to the audit team leader
C. No, the audit team leader did not receive details on the audit team's training requirements

Answer: B

Explanation:
The certification body providedall the necessary information, including scope, objectives, methods, contact information, and risks.
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.2.3.1and ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 9.2 state that the certification body must equip the audit team leader with sufficient information for audit planning and execution.
* TheLead Auditor Study Materialconfirms:"Audit planning must be supported by complete and verified information provided by the certification body." Reference:ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.2.3.1; ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 9.2.

NEW QUESTION # 76
......

Constantly updated multiple mock exams with a great number of questions that will help you in better self-assessment. Memorize all your previous ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam (ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor) exam questions attempts and display all the changes in your results at the end of each PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Practice Exam attempt. Users will be able to customize the ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor practice test software by time or question types. Supported on all Windows-based PCs.

ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor PDF Cram Exam: https://www.actualtorrent.com/ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor-questions-answers.html

Report this page

100% PASS QUIZ 2025 ISO-IEC-42001-LEAD-AUDITOR: TRUSTABLE VERIFIED ISO/IEC 42001:2023ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM LEAD AUDITOR EXAM ANSWERS

100% Pass Quiz 2025 ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor: Trustable Verified ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam Answers